Re: conftest files

[Paul Eggert]

Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden> writes:

>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf/2006-08/txtR7NYOc7wYg.txt

> Paul, is Stepan's patch still ok at this point?  (Should we consider
> using dnl instead of `#' as the macro gets expanded very often in a
> typical configure script?)

Thanks for reminding me.  I installed his patch, with dnl's, just
before cutting 2.60a.  Thanks again, Stepan.

I agree with you also that the other proposed patch needs some
seasoning, so I put out 2.60a without it.