autoconf-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 1/2] AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR: accept more than one argument


From: Stefano Lattarini
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR: accept more than one argument
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 13:51:12 +0200

On 07/04/2012 01:28 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 07/04/2012 05:03 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> 
>> Would it also make sense to allow multiple calls to AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR
>> to stack, as in:
>>
>> AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR([dir1])
>> AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR([dir2])
>>
>> And should we mention that the first directory listed has special
>> significance to other tools like libtool that use the first directory
>> (and ignore subsequent directories) when first preparing a package with
>> libtoolize?  For that matter, I'd have to investigate whether libtoolize
>> uses grep or autoconf tracing;
> 
> Libtool 2.4.2 (the current release) uses grep tracing; but libtool
> commit 2a71b02b has already converted over to m4 tracing.  I'm not sure
> if the m4 tracing will gracefully handle whitespace-separated
> directories or multiple invocations, but the old code:
> 
> -   /AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR(/ {
> -       s,^.*AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR([[  ]*\([^])]*\).*$,ac_macro_dir=\1,
> -       p
> -        }
> 
> definitely does NOT handle whitespace lists, and with multiple calls,
> appears to reassign $ac_macro_dir to the last call rather than the first
> (yuck).
>
Thanks for digging this out (and sorry for duplicating part of it in my
earlier reply).

> I think we're stuck for compatibility with providing a new macro for
> listing subsidiary directories, and that users that plan to interact
> with old libtool must use something like:
> 
> AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR([dir1])
> AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIRS([dir2 dir3])
> AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIRS([dir4])
> 
> where the new macro can stack or take whitespace lists.  The new macro
> can also auto-call AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR() for its first argument for new
> libtool that traces rather than using sed, but if you are porting to
> older libtool, explicitly spelling out the old name is important.
> 
OK.  The new code to support this in aclocal will amount to one line of
code :-)  And the 'AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIRS' name is preferable IMHO, being
more faithful to the intended semantics (several directories supported).

Anyway, to avoid a continuous accretion of backward-compatibility cruft, I
think we should also "deprecate" AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR in the documentation,
stating that it should only be required by older libtools, and add a FIXME
comment to its definition in general.m4 telling that it should be removed
by 2014 or so.

Regards,
  Stefano



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]