autoconf-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 3/3] syntax-check: remove SPACE-TAB sequence


From: Eric Blake
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] syntax-check: remove SPACE-TAB sequence
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 08:45:39 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121029 Thunderbird/16.0.2

On 11/16/2012 04:48 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> Hi Peter.
> 
> On 11/16/2012 12:38 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> On 2012-11-16 11:37, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>>> * lib/autoconf/c.m4 (_AC_PROG_CC_C99): Here.  Was causing a
>>> failure in the 'space_tab' syntax check.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stefano Lattarini <address@hidden>
>>> ---
>>>  lib/autoconf/c.m4 | 2 +-
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/lib/autoconf/c.m4 b/lib/autoconf/c.m4
>>> index 0802f85..b1edf17 100644
>>> --- a/lib/autoconf/c.m4
>>> +++ b/lib/autoconf/c.m4
>>> @@ -1349,7 +1349,7 @@ dnl Try
>>>  dnl GCC            -std=gnu99 (unused restrictive modes: -std=c99 
>>> -std=iso9899:1999)
>>>  dnl IBM XL C       -qlanglvl=extc1x (V12.1; does not pass C11 test)
>>>  dnl IBM XL C       -qlanglvl=extc99
>>> -dnl                (pre-V12.1; unused restrictive mode: -qlanglvl=stdc99)
>>> +dnl             (pre-V12.1; unused restrictive mode: -qlanglvl=stdc99)
>>>  dnl HP cc  -AC99
>>>  dnl Intel ICC      -std=c99, -c99 (deprecated)
>>>  dnl IRIX   -c99
>>>
>>
>> But the surrounding uses TABs, not spaces.
>>
> Well spotted.  I've fixed that locally.

Autoconf has not yet made the global switch away from TABs, but I'm
willing to go that route to match what other GNU projects have done.  In
the meantime, fixing the syntax check makes sense, so ACK to either what
you proposed, or your fixed version with local TAB fixes in this area.

-- 
Eric Blake   address@hidden    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]