autoconf-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Remove unused function warning from AC_C_INLINE


From: Kurt Schwehr
Subject: Re: Remove unused function warning from AC_C_INLINE
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 11:06:42 -0700

sigh.  Yes, I was missing the return.

git diff
diff --git a/lib/autoconf/c.m4 b/lib/autoconf/c.m4
index b58e42d..74c6aa8 100644
--- a/lib/autoconf/c.m4
+++ b/lib/autoconf/c.m4
@@ -1742,7 +1742,7 @@ for ac_kw in inline __inline__ __inline; do
 [#ifndef __cplusplus
 typedef int foo_t;
 static $ac_kw foo_t static_foo () {return 0; }
-$ac_kw foo_t foo () {return 0; }
+$ac_kw foo_t foo () {return static_foo(); }
 #endif
 ])],
                    [ac_cv_c_inline=$ac_kw])



On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Eric Blake <address@hidden> wrote:
On 06/09/2014 10:47 AM, Kurt Schwehr wrote:
> See also:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-autoconf/2014-06/msg00004.html
>
> git diff
> diff --git a/lib/autoconf/c.m4 b/lib/autoconf/c.m4
> index b58e42d..877b030 100644
> --- a/lib/autoconf/c.m4
> +++ b/lib/autoconf/c.m4
> @@ -1742,7 +1742,7 @@ for ac_kw in inline __inline__ __inline; do
>  [#ifndef __cplusplus
>  typedef int foo_t;
>  static $ac_kw foo_t static_foo () {return 0; }
> -$ac_kw foo_t foo () {return 0; }
> +$ac_kw foo_t foo () {static_foo(); }

Don't you still need the 'return' ?

--
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org




--
http://maps.google.com/ocean - http://schwehr.org/blog

Attachment: ac_c_inline.patch
Description: Text Data


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]