Re: AM_INCLUDE is a bad name.

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Feb  7, 2001, Akim Demaille <address@hidden> wrote:

> I am referring to other applications depending upon Autoconf such as
> Automake, for which it is perfectly reasonable to require a version of
> Autoconf which is released.

But I disagree it's perfectly reasonable to require the latest
released version of autoconf just because we can.  For a long time,
automake was still tested with Perl 4, just because it could support
Perl 4, without forcing its users to upgrade.  However, as soon as
autoconf 2.50 is available (or even earlier), automake may want to use
its new features.  AC_VERSION_CASE would be a good thing in this case.
Ditto for libtool.  And for any other tool that wants to impose as
little as possible onto its users.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  address@hidden, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        address@hidden, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me