[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
The %.o: %.cc rule
|
From: |
Clark Rawlins |
|
Subject: |
The %.o: %.cc rule |
|
Date: |
Sun, 3 Jun 2001 21:56:33 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.18i |
Besides the reason that it's not nessasary are there any reasons why
the automake inference rules for C and C++ don't use -o ?
I seem to remember that some compilers don't accept -o is this correct?
If so what is the typical way of dealing with the lack of -o when
you want it?
pgpxcS8Ov336h.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- The %.o: %.cc rule,
Clark Rawlins <=
- Re: The %.o: %.cc rule, Harlan Stenn, 2001/06/03
- Re: The %.o: %.cc rule, Clark Rawlins, 2001/06/04
- Re: The %.o: %.cc rule, Tom Tromey, 2001/06/04
- Re: The %.o: %.cc rule, Clark Rawlins, 2001/06/04
- Re: The %.o: %.cc rule, Raja R Harinath, 2001/06/04
- Re: The %.o: %.cc rule, Tom Tromey, 2001/06/05
- Re: The %.o: %.cc rule, Clark Rawlins, 2001/06/05
- Re: The %.o: %.cc rule, Raja R Harinath, 2001/06/05