[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CVS version test failures on cygwin
From: |
Charles S. Wilson |
Subject: |
Re: CVS version test failures on cygwin |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Jul 2001 21:43:46 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; m18) Gecko/20001108 Netscape6/6.0 |
Tom Tromey wrote:
"Charles" == Charles S Wilson <address@hidden> writes:
Charles> ccnoco -- reported on other platforms as "works with
Charles> autoconf-2.13, breaks with 2.52" Same here.
I checked in a fix for this.
Charles> libtool2 -- I don't have libtool installed; this test looks
Charles> for "libtoolize" within the build directory. Is that
Charles> significant?
It might be.
I added a test for libtoolize to this test.
Could you update and try it again?
It's crunching now. (I had built/installed libtool, so I had to
uninstall libtool in order to test your most recent automake changes
with the same environment I used earlier. :-) )
It'll be a while before the tests finish. :-) For now, I just noticed
that the 'ccnoco' test PASSed. I'll send a complete report in an hour
or so when the tests complete.
Charles> subdir5 -- when I ran the verbose test, I got "Expected
Charles> Failure" NOT "unexpected pass". I don't know why the results
Charles> were different between the non-verbose and verbose runs.
Me neither.
I think I know. I changed my binutils over to use Paul Sokolovsky's
auto-imports patch in between. thus, with the original
"cygwin-official" binutils, I get the unexpected pass. After compiling
binutils from source (patched with Robert Collins' version of Paul
Sokolovsky's auto-import patch), THEN I ran the verbose tests -- and get
the 'expected failure'.
BTW, has the following patch been applied to CVS yet? (I don't see it).
[PATCH] fix install on cygwin with shared libraries
http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/libtool/2001-June/004990.html
According to Robert Collins, this is necessary to install correctly.
--Chuck