[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Plan for single Makefile
From: |
Robert Collins |
Subject: |
Re: Plan for single Makefile |
Date: |
28 Jul 2001 12:29:56 +1000 |
On 28 Jul 2001 03:18:42 +0100, Lars Hecking wrote:
>
> > top_src
> > \1a
> > \1a\2a
> > \1a\2b
>
> > Make in 2a will behave the way it does today, just building whats in
> > that dir and any dependencies, make in 1a will do a single-makefile
> > build of 1a and it's subdirs.
>
> You probably hit the nail on the head in terms of "correct approach",
> but I believe this would create massive problems for automake. It would
> require several passes when creating Makefile(.in)s.
It shouldn't require that much effort: build a set of rules for each
target Makefile, and when you add a rule from a directory, add it to all
the parent directories. Then at the end of a single pass you have all
the needed rules in all the output files.
Surely a similar process is used now for cross-directory dependencies?
Rob
- Plan for single Makefile, Tom Tromey, 2001/07/27
- Re: Plan for single Makefile, Pavel Roskin, 2001/07/27
- Re: Plan for single Makefile, Michael Poole, 2001/07/27
- Re: Plan for single Makefile, Lars Hecking, 2001/07/27
- Re: Plan for single Makefile, Eric Siegerman, 2001/07/27
- Re: Plan for single Makefile, Robert Collins, 2001/07/28
- Re: Plan for single Makefile, Eric Siegerman, 2001/07/30
- Re: Plan for single Makefile, Tom Tromey, 2001/07/31
Re: Plan for single Makefile, Tom Tromey, 2001/07/31
Re: Plan for single Makefile, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2001/07/28