Re: variable substitution refs [PATCH]

[Richard Boulton]

On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 10:31:13PM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
> Thanks.  I agree with your analysis and your patch.
> However, I'm checking in a slight variant.  I made a new global to
> hold the pattern we use to match substitution references.
> Doing that is somewhat self-documenting; it means we don't have to add
> a comment explaining what some random regular expression is meant to
> do.

Okay, that seems good to me.

> Nothing unfortunate about that.  However, I got the messages in
> reverse order.  Akim numbers his patches to handle this problem; that
> is one convenient approach.

I think I'll start doing that then.

> Richard>  cond13.test \
> Richard>  cond14.test \
> Richard>  cond15.test \
> Richard> +cond16.test \
> 
> There is no cond15.test.
> Odd.

I think an earlier patch of mine got lost.  I'll resubmit it.
I'll definitely start numbering my patches.

-- 
Richard