[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: XXX_CFLAGS
From: |
Alexandre Duret-Lutz |
Subject: |
Re: XXX_CFLAGS |
Date: |
13 Aug 2001 21:06:09 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 |
>>> "Ralf" == Ralf Corsepius <address@hidden> writes:
[...]
Ralf> * I would expect <program|library>_CFLAGS to be handled similiar to
Ralf> INCLUDES or DEFS (except for not being applied globally), but I do not
Ralf> expect it to rename files.
BTW, another difference is that per-target CFLAGS also imply
per-object compilation rules which can result in a significant
grow of the Makefile size on large projects.
Ralf> * Similarily, I would expect hello_c_o_CFLAGS to be applied to the
Ralf> compilation of a single *.c/o's only.
Ralf> * I don't see why using a single set of per-target CFLAGS
Ralf> causes the necessity of rename the files. Renaming them
Ralf> when using several such FLAGS for a _single_ target to
Ralf> compile files multiple times might give sence. AFAIU,
Ralf> multiple compilation however still requires to code the
Ralf> flags into Makefile.am, therefore it should be detectable
Ralf> by automake and therefore it should be technically
Ralf> possible to keep the old naming until multiple compiles
Ralf> are used.
This sounds sensible to me (actually I wished that too the first
time I tried per-target CFLAGS).
Besides, if Automake was taught how to compute conflicting
object filenames (to rename only those files). It could also be
improved to accept `a.c' and `a.cpp' in the same program (I
believe it doesn't support this, does it?).
[...]
Ralf> I am not sure, but I suspect the naming not being safe against DOS/Win
Ralf> filenaming conventions (At the moment, I don't have access to such
Ralf> systems, so can't validate this statement).
I think you could use `hello_c_SHORTNAME = h'.
--
Alexandre Duret-Lutz