[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug?
From: |
Robert Collins |
Subject: |
Re: bug? |
Date: |
16 Aug 2001 12:02:04 +1000 |
On 15 Aug 2001 20:30:50 -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
> >>>>> "Robert" == Robert Collins <address@hidden> writes:
>
> Robert> Makefile.am with
> Robert> DIST_SUBDIRS = foo
> Robert> and no SUBDIRS line won't itererate down into foo during make dist.
>
> Robert> Who'd want that? non-recursive automake :].
>
> Maybe we should just generate an error if someone defines DIST_SUBDIRS
> but not SUBDIRS? This seems like an odd case.
I used it (with
SUBDIRS =
) to generate a non-recursive automake environment. The subdirectory
still needs a Makefile but we don't want to iterate down into it. Thus
DIST_SUBDIRS is a great tool to get the subdirectory included in the
dist tarball, and have the Makefile.am->in created.
Rob
> Tom
- bug?, Robert Collins, 2001/08/15
- Re: bug?, Tom Tromey, 2001/08/15
- Re: bug?,
Robert Collins <=