[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: automake reports .lo file created with and without libtool
From: |
Tom Tromey |
Subject: |
Re: automake reports .lo file created with and without libtool |
Date: |
06 May 2002 00:17:42 -0600 |
>>>>> "Richard" == Richard Boulton <address@hidden> writes:
[ Sorry for the delay in my reply. Lately, as you probably can tell,
I've only been reading automake email intermittently. ]
Richard> sbin_PROGRAMS = camel-lock-helper ...
Richard> lib_LTLIBRARIES = libcamel.la
Richard> libcamel_la_SOURCES = ... camel-lock.c ...
Richard> camel_lock_helper_SOURCES = ... camel-lock.c ...
Richard> Perhaps the appropriate solution is for automake to notice
Richard> the conflict, and automatically use libtool to compile the
Richard> objects for camel-lock-helper and to link it.
You can already work around this in a couple ways.
One way is to put camel-lock.c into a convenience library that is then
used by both libcamel and camel-lock-helper.
Another way is to introduce per-exe or per-library CFLAGS for one of
the programs and thus cause the .o to be renamed.
Automatically fixing the problem in the general case is probably hard.
Tom
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: automake reports .lo file created with and without libtool,
Tom Tromey <=