automake
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: lib_DATA


From: Alexandre Duret-Lutz
Subject: Re: lib_DATA
Date: 07 Jul 2002 11:41:26 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7

>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <address@hidden> writes:

 >>>>>> "adl" == Alexandre Duret-Lutz <address@hidden> writes:
 adl> I tend to agree.  Given that users can define their own
 adl> unchecked directories, this restriction doesn't make much sense.

 Tom> The code in question predates the ability to define one's own
 Tom> directories.  Now it functions only as a simple sanity check; it
 Tom> forces you to override things in unusual cases.  I'm not wedded to
 Tom> having this constraint.  Though perhaps just allowing lib_DATA would
 Tom> be a more conservative change.

Today we could also turn this error into a warning.  After all,
using lib_DATA does not prevent Automake from producing a
correct Makefile.in.  People could then disable this with
-Wno-mumble (and it could be disabled by default in foreign
mode).  Any idea what `mumble' should be?
-- 
Alexandre Duret-Lutz




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]