[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: top-level Makefile required?
From: |
Harlan Stenn |
Subject: |
Re: top-level Makefile required? |
Date: |
Sat, 03 Aug 2002 23:22:12 -0400 |
User-agent: |
EMH/1.10.0 SEMI/1.13.7 (Awazu) FLIM/1.13.2 (Kasanui) XEmacs/21.1 (patch 14) (Cuyahoga Valley) (i386--freebsd) |
I typed it correctly in configure.ac and incorrectly in my email.
H
--
> On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 07:55:43PM -0400, Harlan Stenn wrote:
> > Is it a bug or a feature that when using automake+autoconf there Must be a
> > top-level Makefile?
> >
> > I tried to write a test case for automake (debugging the AM_CONDITIONAL
> > slowdown problem I'm seeing) and I wrote a top-level configure.ac that only
> > specified the following outputs:
> >
> > AC_CONFIG_FILE(a/Makefile)
> > AC_CONFIG_FILE(b/Makefile)
> > AC_OUTPUT
> >
> > and when I ran automake on this I never got either of those Makefile.in's
> > generated.
>
> s/AC_CONFIG_FILE/AC_CONFIG_FILES/
>
> --
> Alexandre Duret-Lutz