[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: proposal to fork the build-tools projects
From: |
Dean Povey |
Subject: |
Re: proposal to fork the build-tools projects |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Oct 2002 05:38:49 +1000 |
>> (im not an expert on autotools and this may sound simplistic, but
>> FWIW) Ive often wondered why ./configure has to be a script, i
>> understand it has to be portable, but couldnt the build tools compile
>> a binary that calls on a c library that provides most of the
>> functionality.
>
>Maybe I am the one now who is totally not getting it, but:
>
>How could you distribute a binary to run on all the different kinds of
>systems? I use Cygwin and MinGW. Am I going to be excluded from Open
>Source packages because the package maintainer decided not to provide
>such a binary? I don't follow the logic here. Are you saying that the
>package maintainer will compile a binary "./configure" using h[er|is]
>"build tools"? Or are you saying each end user will first unroll the
>tarball and then build a binary "./configure" (the latter being the only
>way that seems to make sense). Then you still have the problem of the C
>library. I assume if the latter, that there will be a canonical download
>location (+ mirrors) for precompiled libraries (on my platform(s), that
>means Windoze DLLs)?
The easiest way would be for ./configure to find the C compiler and build
a simple utility binary from source, then use that for the rest of the
configuration.
--
Dean Povey, |em: address@hidden|JCSI: Java security toolkit
Wedgetail Communications|ph: +61 7 3023 5139 |uPKI: Embedded/C PKI toolkit
Level 14, 388 Queen St, |fax: +61 7 3023 5199 |uSSL: Embedded/C SSL toolkit
Brisbane, Australia |www: www.wedgetail.com |XML Security: XML Signatures
- Re: proposal to fork the build-tools projects, (continued)
- Re: proposal to fork the build-tools projects, Pavel Roskin, 2002/10/13
- Re: proposal to fork the build-tools projects, Tom Lord, 2002/10/13
- Re: proposal to fork the build-tools projects, Bruce Korb, 2002/10/13
- Re: proposal to fork the build-tools projects, Glenn McGrath, 2002/10/13
- Re: proposal to fork the build-tools projects, Soren A, 2002/10/15
- Re: proposal to fork the build-tools projects,
Dean Povey <=
- Re: proposal to fork the build-tools projects, Glenn McGrath, 2002/10/14
- Re: proposal to fork the build-tools projects, Bruce Korb, 2002/10/14
- Re: proposal to fork the build-tools projects, Andreas Buening, 2002/10/14
- Re: proposal to fork the build-tools projects, Soren A, 2002/10/15
- Re: proposal to fork the build-tools projects, Bernd Jendrissek, 2002/10/15
Re: proposal to fork the build-tools projects, Peter Eisentraut, 2002/10/15