[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: backward compatability of tools
|
From: |
Thomas E. Dickey |
|
Subject: |
Re: backward compatability of tools |
|
Date: |
Sat, 22 Feb 2003 06:24:19 -0500 (EST) |
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, John Burger wrote:
> It seems to be explicitly against the philosophy of Autoconf to do
> anything in response to particular hardware or OS versions. Rather,
back to the original point - changes were made to autoconf which made
it incompatible with known, widely-used versions of Bourne shell for
no better reason than nicety of implementation.
You don't need a special test for that.
--
T.E.Dickey <address@hidden>
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
- Re: 1,000 year backward compatability of tools, (continued)
- Re: 1,000 year backward compatability of tools, Paul Eggert, 2003/02/19
- Re: 1,000 year backward compatability of tools, Charles Wilson, 2003/02/19
- Re: 1,000 year backward compatability of tools, Bruce Korb, 2003/02/19
- Re: 1,000 year backward compatability of tools, Harlan Stenn, 2003/02/19
- Re: 1,000 year backward compatability of tools, Bruce Korb, 2003/02/19
- Re: 1,000 year backward compatability of tools, Chris Albertson, 2003/02/20
- Re: backward compatability of tools, Chris Albertson, 2003/02/19
- Re: backward compatability of tools, Russ Allbery, 2003/02/19
- Message not available
- Re: backward compatability of tools, Dr. David Kirkby, 2003/02/21
- Re: backward compatability of tools, John Burger, 2003/02/21
- Re: backward compatability of tools,
Thomas E. Dickey <=