[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: automake & flex's -P option
From: |
Thomas E. Dickey |
Subject: |
Re: automake & flex's -P option |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Mar 2003 06:24:04 -0500 (EST) |
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Richard Dawe wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Akim Demaille wrote:
> [snip]
> > I think a lot could be done to improve the interface provided that we
> > require Bison and Flex. The problem here stems on the willingness to
> > be yacc/lex portable.
> [snip]
>
> Out of interest: Is it a hard requirement that automake should work with lex,
> yacc rather than requiring flex, bison? Or is it likely to change in the
> future?
the autoconf maintainers do not appear to be interested in maintaining
compatibility with lex/yacc (other than paying lip-service to the notion).
--
T.E.Dickey <address@hidden>
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
- automake & flex's -P option, Richard Dawe, 2003/03/03
- Re: automake & flex's -P option, Akim Demaille, 2003/03/13
- Re: automake & flex's -P option, Richard Dawe, 2003/03/17
- Re: automake & flex's -P option, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/03/17
- Re: automake & flex's -P option, Akim Demaille, 2003/03/18
- Re: automake & flex's -P option, Thomas E. Dickey, 2003/03/18
- Re: automake & flex's -P option, Richard Dawe, 2003/03/18
- Re: automake & flex's -P option,
Thomas E. Dickey <=
- Re: automake & flex's -P option, Earnie Boyd, 2003/03/18
- Re: automake & flex's -P option, Thomas E. Dickey, 2003/03/18