|
From: | Guido Draheim |
Subject: | Re: Better to use LIBADD always and never LDADD? |
Date: | Mon, 21 Apr 2003 23:35:55 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de-AT; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 |
you can ensure that some options go before the others, e.g. flags go before library references. address@hidden schrieb:
For "convenience libraries" I just successfully used LDADD. It looks like LIBADD would also have worked which uses LIBTOOL..... I think LDADD is only for stuff you will *link* with executable and LIBADD is more powerful and used for other things like making real libraries you really intend to install on system. If true, wouldn't it be a good idea to get in habit of using LIBADD (and Libtool) for everything? i.e. Why use 2 commands if 1 does both functions? Chris
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |