Re: Better to use LIBADD always and never LDADD?

[cs]

>   you can ensure that some options go before the
>   others, e.g. flags go before library references.

Guido

Thanks.  I'm sorry I did not get the context of your reply.
Are you giving a reason why LDADD is useful?
Are you giving a reason why LTADD should always
be used? I didn't understand.

Chris

   address@hidden schrieb:
   > For "convenience libraries" I just successfully
   > used LDADD.  It looks like LIBADD would also have
   > worked which uses LIBTOOL.....
   >
   > I think LDADD is only for stuff you will *link*
   > with executable and LIBADD is more powerful and used
   > for other things like making real libraries you really
   > intend to install on system.
   >
   > If true, wouldn't it be a good idea to get in habit
   > of using LIBADD (and Libtool) for everything?
   >
   > i.e.
   > Why use 2 commands if 1 does both functions?
   >
   > Chris
   >
   >
   >
   >
   >