[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: automake -vs- huge projects
From: |
Bob Friesenhahn |
Subject: |
Re: automake -vs- huge projects |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 14:53:18 -0600 (CST) |
Another thing that would help reduce Makefile size is to introduce
synonyms for subdirectory paths. For example,
java/awt/print/$(DEPDIR)/
could be reduced to $(am_f123). This would of course obfusticate the
Makefile, so it should be made optional, or allow the user to specify
part of the name so it is still comprehensible.
Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
address@hidden
http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, (continued)
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Lars Hecking, 2003/12/17
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Paul D. Smith, 2003/12/17
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Bob Friesenhahn, 2003/12/17
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Norman Gray, 2003/12/17
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Ralf Corsepius, 2003/12/18
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Bob Friesenhahn, 2003/12/18
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Paul D. Smith, 2003/12/18
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2003/12/18
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Paul D. Smith, 2003/12/19
Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Thomas Fitzsimmons, 2003/12/16
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects,
Bob Friesenhahn <=
Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/12/16
Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/12/16