[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: automake -vs- huge projects
From: |
Bob Friesenhahn |
Subject: |
Re: automake -vs- huge projects |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 15:07:17 -0600 (CST) |
I would like to point out that my previous gripe about the unnecessary
translation of Automake target names (particularly when the target
includes a path), and the subsequent proposal to add user-level target
synonyms, dovetails nicely with the need to reduce the Makefile size.
The synonyms can help eliminate the size increase caused by the
directory path itself. For typical subdirectory path lengths, this
could result in a 40% Makefile size reduction.
Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
address@hidden
http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen
- automake -vs- huge projects, Tom Tromey, 2003/12/16
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Bob Friesenhahn, 2003/12/16
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Paul D. Smith, 2003/12/16
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Bob Friesenhahn, 2003/12/16
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects,
Bob Friesenhahn <=
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Lars Hecking, 2003/12/17
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Paul D. Smith, 2003/12/17
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Bob Friesenhahn, 2003/12/17
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Norman Gray, 2003/12/17
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Ralf Corsepius, 2003/12/18
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Bob Friesenhahn, 2003/12/18
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Paul D. Smith, 2003/12/18
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2003/12/18
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Paul D. Smith, 2003/12/19
Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Thomas Fitzsimmons, 2003/12/16