[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: automake -vs- huge projects
|
From: |
Bob Friesenhahn |
|
Subject: |
Re: automake -vs- huge projects |
|
Date: |
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 09:01:04 -0600 (CST) |
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Lars Hecking wrote:
>
> What about an automake option then to generate Makefiles for GNU make?
How about a new binary 'automake' program that doesn't require an
external 'make' program at all? It would read the Makefile.am files
directly ...
Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
address@hidden
http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen
- automake -vs- huge projects, Tom Tromey, 2003/12/16
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Bob Friesenhahn, 2003/12/16
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Paul D. Smith, 2003/12/16
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Bob Friesenhahn, 2003/12/16
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Bob Friesenhahn, 2003/12/16
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Lars Hecking, 2003/12/17
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Paul D. Smith, 2003/12/17
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects,
Bob Friesenhahn <=
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Norman Gray, 2003/12/17
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Ralf Corsepius, 2003/12/18
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Bob Friesenhahn, 2003/12/18
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Paul D. Smith, 2003/12/18
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2003/12/18
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Paul D. Smith, 2003/12/19
Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Thomas Fitzsimmons, 2003/12/16