[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: automake -vs- huge projects
From: |
Norman Gray |
Subject: |
Re: automake -vs- huge projects |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 15:17:00 +0000 (GMT) |
Greetings,
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Lars Hecking wrote:
> >
> > What about an automake option then to generate Makefiles for GNU make?
>
> How about a new binary 'automake' program that doesn't require an
> external 'make' program at all? It would read the Makefile.am files
> directly ...
An excellent idea!
Replace `make' with a (Scheme) module for scsh[1]. That way, you get
a sane language to write rules in (unlike sh), and your makefiles are
platform independent (since scsh has been ported widely). With that done
(and it's little more than a learning exercise), it would be conceptually
straightforward to rewrite automake as a system sitting on top of it.
Not _really_ joking,
Norman
[1] www.scsh.net
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Norman Gray http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/norman/
Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, UK address@hidden
- automake -vs- huge projects, Tom Tromey, 2003/12/16
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Bob Friesenhahn, 2003/12/16
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Paul D. Smith, 2003/12/16
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Bob Friesenhahn, 2003/12/16
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Bob Friesenhahn, 2003/12/16
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Lars Hecking, 2003/12/17
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Paul D. Smith, 2003/12/17
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Bob Friesenhahn, 2003/12/17
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects,
Norman Gray <=
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Ralf Corsepius, 2003/12/18
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Bob Friesenhahn, 2003/12/18
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Paul D. Smith, 2003/12/18
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2003/12/18
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Paul D. Smith, 2003/12/19
Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Thomas Fitzsimmons, 2003/12/16