[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: automake -vs- huge projects
From: |
Thien-Thi Nguyen |
Subject: |
Re: automake -vs- huge projects |
Date: |
18 Dec 2003 21:31:54 -0500 |
"Paul D. Smith" <address@hidden> writes:
If you're willing to require GNU make then I'm quite confidant you
could write automake as nothing more than a suite of GNU make macros
and functions.
I doubt there would be any need for code changes to GNU make at all.
i think it would be cool if automake supported GNU make specifically,
creating GNUmakefile.in from GNUmakefile.am. a GNUmakefile.am would
imply some automake option "gnu-make-only", while automake option
"gnu-make" would create both Makefile.in and GNUmakefile.in. those who
use option "gnu-make" would need to include GNUmakefile in configure.ac
of course.
then, GNU make can DTRT since it prefers GNUmakefile over Makefile, and
other make programs can still function (unless option "gnu-make-only" is
used by the package maintainer in which case that should be mentioned in
README or somesuch).
thi
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, (continued)
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Paul D. Smith, 2003/12/16
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Bob Friesenhahn, 2003/12/16
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Bob Friesenhahn, 2003/12/16
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Lars Hecking, 2003/12/17
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Paul D. Smith, 2003/12/17
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Bob Friesenhahn, 2003/12/17
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Norman Gray, 2003/12/17
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Ralf Corsepius, 2003/12/18
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Bob Friesenhahn, 2003/12/18
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Paul D. Smith, 2003/12/18
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects,
Thien-Thi Nguyen <=
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Paul D. Smith, 2003/12/19
Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Thomas Fitzsimmons, 2003/12/16
Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/12/16
Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/12/16