[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: aclocal-1.8/m4_include behaving oddly
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
Subject: |
Re: aclocal-1.8/m4_include behaving oddly |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Dec 2003 15:17:54 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Phil Edwards <address@hidden> writes:
> One of the GCC runtime libraries (libstdc++-v3) has for years contained
> the following lines in acinclude.m4:
>
> m4_include([../libtool.m4])
> dnl The lines below arrange for aclocal not to bring an installed
> dnl libtool.m4 into aclocal.m4, while still arranging for automake to
> dnl add a definition of LIBTOOL to Makefile.in.
> ifelse(,,,[AC_SUBST(LIBTOOL)
> AC_DEFUN([AM_PROG_LIBTOOL])
> AC_DEFUN([AC_LIBTOOL_DLOPEN])
> AC_DEFUN([AC_PROG_LD])
> ])
>
> I've been content to ignore them, since I don't understand libtool.
> But now we're trying to move to the latest released tools, and aclocal
> 1.8 flags errors dealing with that block:
>
> aclocal: macro `_AC_PROG_LIBTOOL' required but not defined
> aclocal: macro `_AC_LIBTOOL_CXX' required but not defined
> aclocal: macro `_AC_LIBTOOL_GCJ' required but not defined
Which means that you don't have libtool.m4 in $datadir/aclocal.
> On the advice of a colleague, I tried adding "-I .." to the command line.
> This worked.
Previous versions of aclocal also required this. If you run aclocal
1.7.x with --verbose you will see that it never looks at ../libtool.m4
unless you pass "-I ..".
> Unless I'm missing some important piece of philosophy, this is also very very
> poor behavior. We've specifically *told* autowhatever to get a file from
> ".." and it's definitely doing something with that file (moving it away
> leads to file-not-found errors). But the definitions inside are somehow
> being ignored, unless we futz with redundant command line options.
aclocal has never looked at (m4_|s)include while collecting files for
scanning.
> We have tried very hard to avoid requiring developers to pass arguments
> to the various autotools, largely because there's no way to help them do
> so automatically.
What's wrong with "ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS = -I .." in Makefile.am?
> And just recently I've been factoring out pieces of our large
> acinclude.m4 into various smaller .m4 files; if the behavior of
> m4_include is suddenly different, we'll have to rethink all that.
There was no change in behaviour. It only worked before because you
had the libtool macros installed in $datadir/aclocal. Presumably you
are using a different prefix for your automake 1.8 installation, so
that $datadir/aclocal is empty or does not exist.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, address@hidden
SuSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."