[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 1.8 and mkdir_p
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: 1.8 and mkdir_p |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:35:05 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5 |
Harlan Stenn wrote:
> > The differences between ALL of the various linux-gnu implementations are
> > so slight that they are far more suited to feature tests than something
> > like this.
>
> Are you really serious? ...
>
> - RC files?
> - packaging mechanism?
> - automount filesystem selection based on different OS versions?
These are good examples for how autoconf may be useful:
- RC files: Check for the existence of /{etc,sbin}/{rc.d,init.d}.
- Packaging mechanism: Test for /bin/rpm and {/usr,}/bin/apt
- automount filesystem selection: Check for /afs. Check for
/etc/init.d/autofs or for autofs in /proc/modules. Check for amd...
Remember: an autoconf macro is written once. A list of Linux distributions
that have a particular feature must be maintained forever.
Bruno
- Re: config.guess and freedom (was: 1.8 and mkdir_p), (continued)
- Re: config.guess and freedom (was: 1.8 and mkdir_p), Harlan Stenn, 2004/01/13
- Re: config.guess and freedom (was: 1.8 and mkdir_p), Bob Proulx, 2004/01/13
- Re: config.guess and freedom (was: 1.8 and mkdir_p), Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/01/13
- Re: config.guess and freedom (was: 1.8 and mkdir_p), Ralf Corsepius, 2004/01/14
- Re: 1.8 and mkdir_p, Scott James Remnant, 2004/01/08
- Re: 1.8 and mkdir_p, Harlan Stenn, 2004/01/13
- Re: 1.8 and mkdir_p,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: 1.8 and mkdir_p, Harlan Stenn, 2004/01/13
- Re: 1.8 and mkdir_p, Scott James Remnant, 2004/01/13
- Re: 1.8 and mkdir_p, Harlan Stenn, 2004/01/13
- Re: 1.8 and mkdir_p, Bob Proulx, 2004/01/14
- Re: 1.8 and mkdir_p, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/01/13
- Re: 1.8 and mkdir_p, Bruno Haible, 2004/01/14
- Re: 1.8 and mkdir_p, Harlan Stenn, 2004/01/14
- Re: 1.8 and mkdir_p, Bruno Haible, 2004/01/14
- Re: 1.8 and mkdir_p, Harlan Stenn, 2004/01/14
Re: 1.8 and mkdir_p, Harlan Stenn, 2004/01/07