|
From: | Sander Niemeijer |
Subject: | Re: adding specific C flags for a SINGLE source file |
Date: | Mon, 13 Dec 2004 12:43:33 +0100 |
user_CFLAGS=$CFLAGS AC_PROG_CC if test "x$user_CFLAGS" = x; then # If the user didn't specify CFLAGS, then CFLAGS contains # a subset of -g -O2 selected by AC_PROG_CC. This is not # a user setting, and we want to be able to override this # locally in our rules, so put these flags in a separate # variable and empty CFLAGS. AC_SUBST([DEFAULTFLAGS], [$CFLAGS]) CFLAGS= fi and in Makefile.am use foo_CFLAGS = $(DEFAULTFLAGS) and libfoo_a_CFLAGS = $(DEFAULTFLAGS) $(O3) as appropriate. ($(O3) being the Makefile variable that contains -O3 if the compiler support it).
I just noticed something else I don't like about this approach. If you do it this way a user will never be able to change CFLAGS and still be able to only provide specific optimization flags for libfoo. For example, it won't be possible to have CFLAGS='-g -O0' but still have libfoo compiled with e.g. '-O2'.
Although I agree that users should always be able to have the last say, I do not think that a user provided CFLAGS setting should override _all_. If it were possible to have '$(CFLAGS) $(O3)' for libfoo (which is not the case in the code example above), then a user would still be able to have the last say if the O3 variable was an AC_ARG_VAR. He would be able to change the globally default flags by providing his own CFLAGS, but in addition would also still be able to tune the optimization of _just_ libfoo by supplying his own values for O3.
With the example above, a user can only tune both global CFLAGS _and_ libfoo optimization flags if he used a 'make DEFAULTFLAGS=... O3=...', which is in my opinion not an ideal approach (it would defeat the purpose of having a CFLAGS variable).
Best regards, Sander
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |