[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: builddir vs. srcdir
From: |
Alexandre Duret-Lutz |
Subject: |
Re: builddir vs. srcdir |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Mar 2005 00:42:26 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
>>> "Paul" == Paul Pogonyshev <address@hidden> writes:
Paul> Stepan Kasal wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 11:56:56PM +0200, Paul Pogonyshev wrote:
>> > because the generated sources are placed into the build directory,
>> > while `make' looks for them in the source directory.
>>
>> generally, make should look for them in both places.
Paul> Yes, and it does look in both places, but the dependencies make `foo.o'
Paul> depend on `$(srcdir)/foo.c',
This could happen if this location was the right one in the
past, and building foo.c in the build directory is a recent
change. In that case the dependency file still have the old
info.
The way to erase dependency info is distclean:
make -k distclean; ./configure; make
--
Alexandre Duret-Lutz
- builddir vs. srcdir, Paul Pogonyshev, 2005/03/09
- Re: builddir vs. srcdir, Stepan Kasal, 2005/03/09
- Re: builddir vs. srcdir, Paul Pogonyshev, 2005/03/09
- Re: builddir vs. srcdir, Stepan Kasal, 2005/03/10
- Re: builddir vs. srcdir, Paul Pogonyshev, 2005/03/10
- Re: builddir vs. srcdir, Stepan Kasal, 2005/03/11
- Re: builddir vs. srcdir, Paul Pogonyshev, 2005/03/12
- Re: builddir vs. srcdir, Stepan Kasal, 2005/03/16
- Re: builddir vs. srcdir, Paul Pogonyshev, 2005/03/18
- Re: builddir vs. srcdir, Stepan Kasal, 2005/03/21
Re: builddir vs. srcdir, Harald Dunkel, 2005/03/10