[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: builddir vs. srcdir
From: |
Stepan Kasal |
Subject: |
Re: builddir vs. srcdir |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Mar 2005 12:46:52 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
Hello,
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 09:34:15PM +0200, Paul Pogonyshev wrote:
> Sorry, but I'll stick with my setup. My parser depends on my lowest-
> level library (`libutils') and almost the whole build-tree depends on
> the generated files. So, when I touched my `libutils' in any way, I
> would get a full-blown rebuild of the project. That's why I used `cmp'
> and only replaced the `.[ch]' files with the newly generated if they
> differed. And so I need timestamps to avoid unecessary commands run
yes, this indeed sounds as a good reason for usiong stamps.
> Anyway, even if I don't accept your advice this time, thank you for
> the help. :)
You are welcome. It was a nice excercise for me, too.
Stepan
- Re: builddir vs. srcdir, (continued)
- Re: builddir vs. srcdir, Stepan Kasal, 2005/03/09
- Re: builddir vs. srcdir, Paul Pogonyshev, 2005/03/09
- Re: builddir vs. srcdir, Stepan Kasal, 2005/03/10
- Re: builddir vs. srcdir, Paul Pogonyshev, 2005/03/10
- Re: builddir vs. srcdir, Stepan Kasal, 2005/03/11
- Re: builddir vs. srcdir, Paul Pogonyshev, 2005/03/12
- Re: builddir vs. srcdir, Stepan Kasal, 2005/03/16
- Re: builddir vs. srcdir, Paul Pogonyshev, 2005/03/18
- Re: builddir vs. srcdir,
Stepan Kasal <=
Re: builddir vs. srcdir, Harald Dunkel, 2005/03/10