[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why doesn't F9x support use AC_FC_SRCEXT?
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: Why doesn't F9x support use AC_FC_SRCEXT? |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Jun 2005 10:09:27 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
* Steven G. Johnson wrote on Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 09:20:55PM CEST:
> Is there some reason why the automake Fortran 9x support does not use
> the AC_FC_SRCEXT macro to determine whether extra flags are needed to
> compile files with .f90 or .f95 extensions?
*snip*
> PS. This would also give you a general way to decide whether to use the
> $(F77) or $(FC) for a given source file - if the user calls
> AC_FC_SRCEXT(foo), then $(FC) should be used for .foo files.
Libtool and its proposed FC support would profit from this as well.
Adjusting the respective --tag=F77/FC could break libtool-1.5.x in some
special situation, I guess. Oh well, dunno if we should care. Decent
Fortran 95 compiler support requires CVS Autoconf anyway (due to
platform-specific fixes)-
Regards,
Ralf, (sorry for a cheap "I wan't this, too" rather than a patch :)