[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 'make dist' and m4 directory
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: 'make dist' and m4 directory |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Jun 2005 09:16:37 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
Hi Jeffrey,
* Jeffrey Sheinberg wrote on Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 01:27:35AM CEST:
>
> I intended to put some local macros into the m4/ directory. These
> macros would be needed for the ./configure script to work,
> therefore they need to be included into the dist tarball.
But your m4 directory is empty. So, you could have just left out all
that.
> If you do agree, then my point is that automake should be smart
> enough to recognize that the m4/ directory be included in the dist
> tarball.
Automake would not include everything below m4/ even if there were
macros in there which aclocal used, but only the actually used macro
files. This is a feature: For example, m4/CVS/ should not be
distributed.
*snip*
> ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS = -I m4
>
> Likewise, now automake has another reason to include the m4/
> directory in the dist tarball.
No, see above.
> I repeat, the problem is that without "EXTRA_DIST += m4", make
> distcheck fails, because the m4/ directory has not been included
> in the dist tarball.
I agree that it is a bug that distcheck fails that way. I don't agree
that Automake should include the empty directory. Just my two cents,
though.
Regards,
Ralf
- 'make dist' and m4 directory, John Ling, 2005/06/22
- Re: 'make dist' and m4 directory, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/06/22
- Re: 'make dist' and m4 directory, John Ling, 2005/06/22
- Re: 'make dist' and m4 directory, Jeffrey Sheinberg, 2005/06/23
- Re: 'make dist' and m4 directory, Ralf Corsepius, 2005/06/23
- Re: 'make dist' and m4 directory, Jeffrey Sheinberg, 2005/06/26
- Re: 'make dist' and m4 directory, Ralf Corsepius, 2005/06/26
- Re: 'make dist' and m4 directory, Jeffrey Sheinberg, 2005/06/26
- Re: 'make dist' and m4 directory,
Ralf Wildenhues <=