Re: Suggestion: AC_DEFINE -> m4_pattern_allow

[Akim Demaille]

>>> "Stepan" == Stepan Kasal <address@hidden> writes:

 > Hello,
 >> * Akim Demaille wrote on Wed, May 31, 2006 at 04:26:17PM CEST:
 >> > I suggest that Automake provide the same feature for AM_CONDITIONAL:

 > well, you already implemented it, granting Alexandre one point for
 > his hint:

 > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html//bug-automake/2004-12/msg00090.html
 > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html//autoconf-patches/2004-12/msg00075.html

 > We definitely should make releases more frequently.  ;-)

 > Consequently, we should all be very grateful to Ralf for his current
 > hard release-engineering work.

It's great news!

I thought I had sent a message about AM_CONDITIONAL's first argument,
but I lost track of it.  In a few words, since $1 appears in the
expansion of AM_CONDITIONAL, I think it too should be
m4_pattern_allow'ed.  AC_SUBST is called only on $1_FALSE and $1_TRUE.