[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: nobase.test
|
From: |
Patrick Welche |
|
Subject: |
Re: nobase.test |
|
Date: |
Mon, 4 Sep 2006 12:30:26 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11 |
Hello Ralf!
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 09:33:20AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> I say we drop the test and require that install-sh be executable.
> After all, this is so much easier to do.
>
> OK to apply?
Sounds good (I didn't understand the advantage of non-executable install-sh)
- though you have a bit on Fortran which might be from another patch?
Cheers,
Patrick
PASS: nobase.test
==================
All 1 tests passed
==================
- nobase.test, Patrick Welche, 2006/09/02
- Re: nobase.test, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/09/03
- Re: nobase.test,
Patrick Welche <=
- Re: nobase.test, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/09/05
- Re: nobase.test, Peter O'Gorman, 2006/09/05
- Re: nobase.test, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/09/06
- Re: nobase.test, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2006/09/06
- Re: nobase.test, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/09/06
- Re: nobase.test, Harlan Stenn, 2006/09/06