[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: nobase.test
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: nobase.test |
Date: |
Tue, 5 Sep 2006 20:58:21 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
[ http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake/2006-09/msg00001.html ]
Hello Patrick,
* Patrick Welche wrote on Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 01:30:26PM CEST:
> On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 09:33:20AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > I say we drop the test and require that install-sh be executable.
> > After all, this is so much easier to do.
> >
> > OK to apply?
>
> Sounds good (I didn't understand the advantage of non-executable install-sh)
I installed that, in the hope that neither Alexandre nor Peter mind. ;-)
> - though you have a bit on Fortran which might be from another patch?
Yeah, sorry about that glitch.
Cheers,
Ralf
* NEWS: Mention that `install-sh' needs executable permissions.
* tests/nobase.test: Adjust.
Report by Patrick Welche.
- nobase.test, Patrick Welche, 2006/09/02
- Re: nobase.test, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/09/03
- Re: nobase.test, Patrick Welche, 2006/09/04
- Re: nobase.test,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: nobase.test, Peter O'Gorman, 2006/09/05
- Re: nobase.test, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/09/06
- Re: nobase.test, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2006/09/06
- Re: nobase.test, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/09/06
- Re: nobase.test, Harlan Stenn, 2006/09/06