[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: nobase.test
From: |
Alexandre Duret-Lutz |
Subject: |
Re: nobase.test |
Date: |
Wed, 06 Sep 2006 13:44:34 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden> writes:
[...]
RW> Maybe there is a solution to all cases. But until then, I don't think
RW> it's a good idea to advertise half-solutions, and employ half-tests.
RW> And yes, that is very much IMHO.
Following these lines, it's nonsense to maintain some
half-support for non-executable install-sh. If we don't want to
support this use-case, ${SHELL} should be fully removed from
every call to install-sh.
And if why stop with install-sh? Any reason mdate-sh, ylwrap, and
friends should be handled differently than install-sh?
(I'm not being sarcastic here; I just don't care which way the
balance tilts, as long as it clearly tilts.)
--
Alexandre Duret-Lutz
Shared books are happy books. http://www.bookcrossing.com/friend/gadl
- nobase.test, Patrick Welche, 2006/09/02
- Re: nobase.test, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/09/03
- Re: nobase.test, Patrick Welche, 2006/09/04
- Re: nobase.test, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/09/05
- Re: nobase.test, Peter O'Gorman, 2006/09/05
- Re: nobase.test, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/09/06
- Re: nobase.test,
Alexandre Duret-Lutz <=
- Re: nobase.test, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/09/06
- Re: nobase.test, Harlan Stenn, 2006/09/06