[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: nobase.test
From: |
Harlan Stenn |
Subject: |
Re: nobase.test |
Date: |
Wed, 06 Sep 2006 19:34:37 +0000 |
What about PATH issues and '.'? It may not be a problem, but the
thought leapt into my mind...
H
--
> Following these lines, it's nonsense to maintain some
> half-support for non-executable install-sh. If we don't want to
> support this use-case, ${SHELL} should be fully removed from
> every call to install-sh.
>
> And if why stop with install-sh? Any reason mdate-sh, ylwrap, and
> friends should be handled differently than install-sh?
- nobase.test, Patrick Welche, 2006/09/02
- Re: nobase.test, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/09/03
- Re: nobase.test, Patrick Welche, 2006/09/04
- Re: nobase.test, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/09/05
- Re: nobase.test, Peter O'Gorman, 2006/09/05
- Re: nobase.test, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/09/06
- Re: nobase.test, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2006/09/06
- Re: nobase.test, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/09/06
- Re: nobase.test,
Harlan Stenn <=