[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: depcomp deficiency [was: m4-1.4.7 build feedback]
From: |
Joseph S. Myers |
Subject: |
Re: depcomp deficiency [was: m4-1.4.7 build feedback] |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:52:34 +0000 (UTC) |
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Eric Blake <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > If they really want to stop parsing options, and pass all remaining
> > arguments to gcc, then they should be using -- between the options they
> > give gcc and the remaining arguments that they pass unchanged.
>
> Which unfortunately does not work since gcc interprets -- as an ambigous
> abbreviation instead of the end-of-option-marker.
This is a GCC bug; please enter it in GCC Bugzilla if not already there.
--
Joseph S. Myers
address@hidden
- depcomp deficiency [was: m4-1.4.7 build feedback], Eric Blake, 2006/09/26
- Re: depcomp deficiency [was: m4-1.4.7 build feedback], Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/09/27
- Re: depcomp deficiency [was: m4-1.4.7 build feedback], Nelson H. F. Beebe, 2006/09/27
- Re: depcomp deficiency [was: m4-1.4.7 build feedback], Eric Blake, 2006/09/27
- Re: depcomp deficiency [was: m4-1.4.7 build feedback], Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/09/27
- Re: depcomp deficiency [was: m4-1.4.7 build feedback], Andreas Schwab, 2006/09/27
- Re: depcomp deficiency [was: m4-1.4.7 build feedback], Eric Blake, 2006/09/27
- Re: depcomp deficiency [was: m4-1.4.7 build feedback], Andreas Schwab, 2006/09/28
- Re: depcomp deficiency [was: m4-1.4.7 build feedback],
Joseph S. Myers <=
- Re: depcomp deficiency [was: m4-1.4.7 build feedback], Nelson H. F. Beebe, 2006/09/28
- Re: depcomp deficiency [was: m4-1.4.7 build feedback], Joseph S. Myers, 2006/09/28
Re: depcomp deficiency [was: m4-1.4.7 build feedback], Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/09/28