[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [automake] Dependency question with _LDADD
|
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
|
Subject: |
Re: [automake] Dependency question with _LDADD |
|
Date: |
Tue, 26 Aug 2008 17:48:10 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
> * Michel Briand wrote on Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 05:09:34PM CEST:
> > libtraining_la_LDFLAGS = -version-info ${LIBRARY_VERSION}
You could add -no-undefined here, so that your library will also be
built shared on w32 systems. Of course, that requires that your library
doesn't use undefined symbols.
Cheers,
Ralf
- [automake] Dependency question with _LDADD, Michel Briand, 2008/08/19
- Re: [automake] Dependency question with _LDADD, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/08/19
- Re: [automake] Dependency question with _LDADD, Michel Briand, 2008/08/26
- Re: [automake] Dependency question with _LDADD, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/08/27
- Re: [automake] Dependency question with _LDADD, Braden McDaniel, 2008/08/27
- Re: [automake] Dependency question with _LDADD, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/08/27
- Re: [automake] Dependency question with _LDADD, Braden McDaniel, 2008/08/27
- Re: [automake] Dependency question with _LDADD, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/08/28
- Re: [automake] Dependency question with _LDADD, Peter Johansson, 2008/08/27