[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Does using automake+autoconf require my project to be GPL'ed?
From: |
Alan Manuel Gloria |
Subject: |
Re: Does using automake+autoconf require my project to be GPL'ed? |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Mar 2009 23:29:43 +0800 |
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Jan Engelhardt <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On Monday 2009-03-09 14:45, almkglor wrote:
> >
> >What I'd like to know is, does using Automake+Autoconf require me to license
> >distributions built using them with the GPL?
> >[...]
> >While GPL is OK by me, it might not be as popular among other developers. ^^
>
> I could list apache-httpd2 as an example that's not GPL.
Thanks! That reassures me a bit; apache-httpd2 appears (from a bare
search) to be under the "Apache License". Is there any particular
feature/interaction/whatever of the Apache License which allows this?
Or is a MIT license "good enough"?
Sincerely,
AmkG