[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Where can I get 1.10a?
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: Where can I get 1.10a? |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Jan 2010 20:30:49 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-10-28) |
Hello Bernd,
* Bernd Jendrissek wrote on Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 03:59:43PM CET:
> I have been trying to update to more recent autotools, and being a
> traceability nazi, I want to rebuild from as far upstream as possible.
> That means ignoring the distributed ./configure and Makefile.in and
> rebuilding them with currently installed autotools.
For Automake, that's not always possible without the bootstrap script.
> Here's my problem: Recent automake depends on automake-1.10a, but I
> can't find that release anywhere.
It's not a release. The naming scheme is such that M.Nc and M.N.Kc
with M, N, K integers, and
c empty are stable releases
c an even character (b, d, f, ...) are test releases
c an odd character (a, c, e, ...) represent VCS (git) versions
of Automake (K = 0 is conventionally omitted, leading to the first form
M.Nc).
> I thought I'd use 1.10b instead, but it too requires 1.10a, so no joy
> there.
Yep, at that time we required development Automake.
> Of course 1.10.N are "too old" according to Version.pm, and 1.11.N
> already require the mysterious 1.10a.
Yep.
> I realize there's the bootstrap script, and it actually lets me go
> much further back into the bootstrap chain, but for now I'm just
> looking for this 1.10a. I can't find it either on ftp.gnu.org nor or
> alpha.gnu.org. Unless I'm not looking hard enough!
I'm afraid you'll have to go with the bootstrap script in this case.
Please note that the Automake bootstrap script is little more than
- replace @foo@ in automake.in and aclocal.in,
- run in-tree aclocal, autoconf, and in-tree automake,
- clean up.
The reason we required 1.10a was IIRC to allow Automake to use the
then-new color-tests feature.
Hope that helps.
Cheers,
Ralf