[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: dist-xz compression level
|
From: |
Pavel Sanda |
|
Subject: |
Re: dist-xz compression level |
|
Date: |
Sun, 11 Apr 2010 22:23:11 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
> Well, does somebody have numbers (memory, time, compression) as to what
> is reasonable?
I didn't make any testing, but the report came from the observation
that result was +300kb on 9 mb. The compression was slow, but
decompression is not affected.
pavel
- dist-xz compression level, Pavel Sanda, 2010/04/07
- Re: dist-xz compression level, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/04/11
- Re: dist-xz compression level, Andreas Jellinghaus, 2010/04/11
- Re: dist-xz compression level, Pavel Sanda, 2010/04/11
- Re: dist-xz compression level, Bob Friesenhahn, 2010/04/11
- Re: dist-xz compression level, Pavel Sanda, 2010/04/11
- Re: dist-xz compression level, Bob Friesenhahn, 2010/04/11
- Re: dist-xz compression level, Pavel Sanda, 2010/04/11
- Re: dist-xz compression level, Reuben Thomas, 2010/04/12
- Re: dist-xz compression level, Andreas Jellinghaus, 2010/04/12
Re: dist-xz compression level, Jim Meyering, 2010/04/12