Re: dist-xz compression level

[Andreas Jellinghaus]

Am Sonntag 11 April 2010 21:37:13 schrieb Andreas Jellinghaus:
> isn't xz extremely sloooow with -9?
> maybe it wasn't a bug, bit intentionally not used,
> as that huge extra amount of time doesn't result in
> that many bytes saved.
> 
> is the compression level configureable somehow?

I did two tests with medium size sources and xz -6 vs. xz -9
is not a big difference in speed or compression size.
so please ignore my comment.

Regards, Andreas