[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: How to use alternative autoconf than what is located in /usr/local/b
From: |
Graham Reitz |
Subject: |
Re: How to use alternative autoconf than what is located in /usr/local/bin (for automake compile)? |
Date: |
Mon, 23 May 2011 17:03:54 -0500 |
Awesome. Thanks Stefano.
>> Host platform: OS X 10.6.7
>>
> Just out of curiousity: how old is this release, and which autoconf version
> are they shipping with it?
10.6.7 is the latest version of OS X.
It ships with (Copyright signature removed from the output):
grahamreitz$ automake --version
automake (GNU automake) 1.10 Written by Tom Tromey <address@hidden> and
Alexandre Duret-Lutz <address@hidden>.
grahamreitz$ autoconf --version
autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.61 Written by David J. MacKenzie and Akim Demaille.
Thanks,
g
On May 23, 2011, at 3:12 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> On Monday 23 May 2011, Graham Reitz wrote:
>> Is their a configure switch to indicate that an alternative autoconf
>> should be used, rather than defaulting to the autoconf located in
>> /usr/local/bin?
>>
> Yes: override the AUTOCONF and AUTOM4TE variables (yes, you need
> to override both); e.g.:
>
> ./configure AUTOCONF=/opt/bin/autoconf AUTOM4TE=/opt/bin/autom4te
>
> That's admittedly not very obvious or natural for someone who's not
> familiar with automake internals. Maybe adding a `--with-autoconf'
> flag (or similar) to configure would be nice on our part.
>
>> With other gnu build deps there is often a --with-*dep=$path_to_dep.
>> Is there an equivalent when building automake from source?
>>
>
>> Host platform: OS X 10.6.7
>>
> Just out of curiousity: how old is this release, and which autoconf version
> are they shipping with it?
>
>> configure command-line:
>>
>> ./../gnu/automake/automake-1.11/configure --prefix=$HOME/Devel
>> opment/root/usr/local --with-autoconf=$HOME/Development/root/usr/local/bin
>>
>> configure output:
>>
>> checking whether autoconf is installed... yes
>> checking whether autoconf works... yes
>> checking whether autoconf is recent enough... no
>> configure: error: Autoconf 2.61a-341 or better is required.
>>
>>
>> graham
>>
>
> HTH,
> Stefano
- How to use alternative autoconf than what is located in /usr/local/bin (for automake compile)?, Graham Reitz, 2011/05/23
- Re: How to use alternative autoconf than what is located in /usr/local/bin (for automake compile)?, Stefano Lattarini, 2011/05/23
- Re: How to use alternative autoconf than what is located in /usr/local/bin (for automake compile)?,
Graham Reitz <=
- Re: How to use alternative autoconf than what is located in /usr/local/bin (for automake compile)?, Daniel Herring, 2011/05/23
- Re: How to use alternative autoconf than what is located in /usr/local/bin (for automake compile)?, Daniel Herring, 2011/05/23
- Re: How to use alternative autoconf than what is located in /usr/local/bin (for automake compile)?, Graham Reitz, 2011/05/23
- make check failures, Graham Reitz, 2011/05/24
- Re: make check failures, Stefano Lattarini, 2011/05/24
- Re: make check failures, Peter Rosin, 2011/05/24
- Message not available
- Re: make check failures, Stefano Lattarini, 2011/05/24
- Re: make check failures, Graham Reitz, 2011/05/24
- Message not available
- [PATCHES] {maint} honour configure-time AUTOCONF and AUTOM4TE (was: Re: make check failures), Stefano Lattarini, 2011/05/29
- Re: [PATCHES] {maint} honour configure-time AUTOCONF and AUTOM4TE (was: Re: make check failures), Stefano Lattarini, 2011/05/29