[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: dealing with executable shell scripts
From: |
Harlan Stenn |
Subject: |
Re: dealing with executable shell scripts |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Mar 2012 18:35:41 -0700 |
> Harlan Stenn <address@hidden> writes:
> > What's the problem with bin_SCRIPTS?
>
> Hmm, I didn't know about it, but ... reading the documentation,
> "bin_SCRIPTS" doesn't actually seem to do much of anything -- you
> still have to add your own rules to handle all the actual work, need
> to fiddle with EXTRA_DIST and CLEANFILES, etc. Indeed, doing what I
> did (putting the script in bin_PROGRAMS and adding a rule to build it)
> actually seems _easier_, as automake will do more automatically, and
> there's less to keep track of for the programmer....
I recommend you actually try it and see for yourself.
There are reasons for using it for scripts instead of using _PROGRAMS.
H
- dealing with executable shell scripts, Miles Bader, 2012/03/19
- Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, Russ Allbery, 2012/03/19
- Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, Harlan Stenn, 2012/03/19
- Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, Russ Allbery, 2012/03/19
- Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, Miles Bader, 2012/03/19
- Re: dealing with executable shell scripts,
Harlan Stenn <=
- Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, Harlan Stenn, 2012/03/19
- Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, Miles Bader, 2012/03/19
- Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, Harlan Stenn, 2012/03/19
- Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, Harlan Stenn, 2012/03/19
- Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, Andrew W. Nosenko, 2012/03/20
- Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, NightStrike, 2012/03/20
- Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, Miles Bader, 2012/03/20
- Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, NightStrike, 2012/03/20
- Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, Bob Friesenhahn, 2012/03/20
- Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, NightStrike, 2012/03/21