Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

automake (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Sun Aug 26 2012 07:26:42 -0400 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• August 26, 2012
  • Re: [PATCH] {master} AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE: allow obsolescent two-args invocation once again, Stefano Lattarini, 07:26
• August 24, 2012
  • [PATCH] {master} AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE: allow obsolescent two-args invocation once again (was: Re: Dynamic package version numbers with Autoconf and Automake), Stefano Lattarini, 05:43
• August 23, 2012
  • Re: Using convenience libraries with non-recursive make, Del Merritt, 09:57
  • The future of Automake-NG (was: Re: [Automake-NG] typo whitelisting, and Automake-NG vs. GNU make runtime), Stefano Lattarini, 06:25
  • Re: [Automake-NG] typo whitelisting, and Automake-NG vs. GNU make runtime, Paolo Bonzini, 05:07
  • Re: [Automake-NG] typo whitelisting, and Automake-NG vs. GNU make runtime, Stefano Lattarini, 04:36
• August 22, 2012
  • Re: Using convenience libraries with non-recursive make, Bob Friesenhahn, 19:12
  • Re: [PATCH] {master} compile: remove support for $(INCLUDES), Eric Blake, 18:12
  • Re: [PATCH] {master} compile: remove support for $(INCLUDES), Paolo Bonzini, 18:03
  • Re: [PATCH] {master} compile: remove support for $(INCLUDES), Stefano Lattarini, 17:53
  • Re: [PATCH] {master} compile: remove support for $(INCLUDES), Eric Blake, 16:28
  • Re: [PATCH] {master} compile: remove support for $(INCLUDES) (was: Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG), Andrew W. Nosenko, 16:25
  • Re: [PATCH] {master} compile: remove support for $(INCLUDES), Diego Elio Pettenò, 15:30
  • Re: [PATCH] {master} compile: remove support for $(INCLUDES) (was: Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG), Paolo Bonzini, 15:13
  • Re: Using convenience libraries with non-recursive make, Del Merritt, 12:06
  • [PATCH] {master} compile: remove support for $(INCLUDES) (was: Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG), Stefano Lattarini, 11:12
  • [PATCH] news: about pattern rules and old-style suffix rules (was: Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG), Stefano Lattarini, 08:36
  • typo whitelisting, and Automake-NG vs. GNU make runtime, Paolo Bonzini, 06:33
  • Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG, Paolo Bonzini, 01:46
• August 21, 2012
  • Re: Cannot Create Executables (configure and -fPIC/-pic), Jeffrey Walton, 19:12
  • Re: Cannot Create Executables (configure and -fPIC/-pic), Robert Boehne, 18:11
  • Cannot Create Executables (configure and -fPIC/-pic), Jeffrey Walton, 18:06
  • Re: [Automake-NG] Automake vs. Automake-NG, Diego Elio Pettenò, 16:52
  • Re: [Automake-NG] Automake vs. Automake-NG, Russ Allbery, 16:45
  • Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG, Paolo Bonzini, 15:45
  • Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG, Stefano Lattarini, 15:15
  • Re: [Automake-NG] Automake vs. Automake-NG, Stefano Lattarini, 15:00
  • Re: [Automake-NG] Automake vs. Automake-NG, Bob Friesenhahn, 14:58
  • Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG, Paolo Bonzini, 14:51
  • Re: [Automake-NG] Automake vs. Automake-NG, Diego Elio Pettenò, 14:29
  • Re: [Automake-NG] Automake vs. Automake-NG, Eric Blake, 14:22
  • Re: [Automake-NG] Automake vs. Automake-NG, Stefano Lattarini, 14:08
  • Re: [Automake-NG] Automake vs. Automake-NG, Bob Friesenhahn, 13:36
  • Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG, Stefano Lattarini, 13:14
  • Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG, Stefano Lattarini, 13:03
  • Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG, Diego Elio Pettenò, 12:48
  • Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG, Paolo Bonzini, 12:46
  • Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG, Ralf Corsepius, 12:33
  • Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG, Paolo Bonzini, 12:03
  • Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG, Paolo Bonzini, 12:02
  • Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG, Stefano Lattarini, 11:54
  • Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG, Stefano Lattarini, 11:50
  • Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG, Paolo Bonzini, 11:49
  • Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG, Stefano Lattarini, 11:42
  • Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG, Stefano Lattarini, 11:38
  • Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG, Diego Elio Pettenò, 11:10
  • Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG, Paolo Bonzini, 11:06
  • Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG, Paolo Bonzini, 11:02
  • Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG, Diego Elio Pettenò, 10:54
  • Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG, Stefano Lattarini, 10:33
  • Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG, Paolo Bonzini, 08:59
  • Automake vs. Automake-NG (was: Re: [PATCH] build: support and require Automake-NG), Stefano Lattarini, 08:44
  • Re: [PATCH] build: support and require Automake-NG, Paolo Bonzini, 06:20
  • Re: [PATCH] build: support and require Automake-NG, Stefano Lattarini, 06:11
• August 20, 2012
  • Re: not running a make rule if distcheck is called, Nick Bowler, 10:46
• August 19, 2012
  • Re: Automake, Autoconf and POSIX shells (was: Re: GraphicsMagick Automake TAP), Bob Friesenhahn, 15:46
  • Automake, Autoconf and POSIX shells (was: Re: GraphicsMagick Automake TAP), Stefano Lattarini, 14:04
  • not running a make rule if distcheck is called, Vincent Torri, 03:37
• August 17, 2012
  • Re: Could the --add-missing option be supported in AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE?, Jeff Johnston, 11:38
  • Could the --add-missing option be supported in AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE? (was: Re: How to automatically get missing files when changing configure.ac?), Stefano Lattarini, 07:03
  • How to automatically get missing files when changing configure.ac?, Jeff Johnston, 00:14
• August 15, 2012
  • Re: GNU Automake 1.12.3 released, Richard Stallman, 17:03
  • Re: Using convenience libraries with non-recursive make, Russ Allbery, 16:26
  • Re: Using convenience libraries with non-recursive make, Del Merritt, 15:49
  • Re: Using convenience libraries with non-recursive make, Bob Friesenhahn, 15:41
  • RE: Using convenience libraries with non-recursive make, John Calcote, 15:16
  • Re: Using convenience libraries with non-recursive make, Diego Elio Pettenò, 15:16
  • Using convenience libraries with non-recursive make, Del Merritt, 15:10
  • Using convenience libraries with non-recursive make, Del Merritt, 15:10
  • Re: Dynamic package version numbers with Autoconf and Automake, Robert Boehne, 12:58
  • Re: Dynamic package version numbers with Autoconf and Automake, Bob Friesenhahn, 09:45
  • Re: Dynamic package version numbers with Autoconf and Automake (was: Re: Automake 1.12.0b test release), Roger Leigh, 09:36
  • Re: Dynamic package version numbers with Autoconf and Automake, Miles Bader, 00:13
• August 14, 2012
  • Re: Dynamic package version numbers with Autoconf and Automake (was: Re: Automake 1.12.0b test release), Bob Friesenhahn, 19:57
  • Re: v1.11.6 tag missing from automake.git?, Eric Blake, 18:37
  • Re: Dynamic package version numbers with Autoconf and Automake (was: Re: Automake 1.12.0b test release), Bob Friesenhahn, 18:26
  • Re: v1.11.6 tag missing from automake.git?, Stefano Lattarini, 18:24
  • Dynamic package version numbers with Autoconf and Automake (was: Re: Automake 1.12.0b test release), Stefano Lattarini, 18:16
  • v1.11.6 tag missing from automake.git?, Eric Blake, 18:16
  • GNU Automake 1.12.3 released, Stefano Lattarini, 07:13
• August 10, 2012
  • Re: distinguish automake 1.11 from 1.12+ at autoconf time, Bob Friesenhahn, 12:05
• August 09, 2012
  • Re: distinguish automake 1.11 from 1.12+ at autoconf time, Stefano Lattarini, 12:33
• August 08, 2012
  • Re: distinguish automake 1.11 from 1.12+ at autoconf time, Ralf Corsepius, 23:53
  • Re: using cygpath for compiling and linking, Baurzhan Ismagulov, 05:22
• August 07, 2012
  • Re: using cygpath for compiling and linking, Bob Friesenhahn, 23:42
  • Re: distinguish automake 1.11 from 1.12+ at autoconf time, Bob Friesenhahn, 23:13
  • using cygpath for compiling and linking, Baurzhan Ismagulov, 18:39
  • Re: distinguish automake 1.11 from 1.12+ at autoconf time, Ralf Corsepius, 02:47
  • Re: distinguish automake 1.11 from 1.12+ at autoconf time, Miles Bader, 02:35
  • Re: distinguish automake 1.11 from 1.12+ at autoconf time, Ralf Corsepius, 02:22
  • Re: distinguish automake 1.11 from 1.12+ at autoconf time, Miles Bader, 02:16
  • Re: distinguish automake 1.11 from 1.12+ at autoconf time, Ralf Corsepius, 00:30
• August 06, 2012
  • Re: distinguish automake 1.11 from 1.12+ at autoconf time, Peter Johansson, 20:08
  • Re: distinguish automake 1.11 from 1.12+ at autoconf time, Eric Blake, 19:36
  • distinguish automake 1.11 from 1.12+ at autoconf time, Peter Johansson, 19:32
• August 05, 2012
  • Re: [Automake] How to get debug symbols in the executable?, Bob Friesenhahn, 11:28
  • Re: [Automake] How to get debug symbols in the executable?, Stefano Lattarini, 05:02
• August 04, 2012
  • Re: [Automake] How to get debug symbols in the executable?, Jeffrey Walton, 20:38
  • [Automake] How to get debug symbols in the executable?, Marcelo Zimbres, 16:44
• August 02, 2012
  • [SOLVED] Re: parallel "make check" output lines are lost!?!, Stefano Lattarini, 12:07
  • Re: parallel "make check" output lines are lost!?!, Jim Meyering, 12:03
  • Re: parallel "make check" output lines are lost!?!, Stefano Lattarini, 05:06
• August 01, 2012
  • parallel "make check" output lines are lost!?!, Jim Meyering, 10:52

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc