automake
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [OMPI devel] GNU Automake 1.14 released


From: Ralph Castain
Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] GNU Automake 1.14 released
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 16:01:30 -0700

I still don't see an issue with just detecting the version of automake being 
used, and setting a conditional that indicates whether or not to use explicitly 
include the subdir. Seems like a pretty trivial solution.


On Sep 3, 2013, at 3:49 PM, "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" <address@hidden> wrote:

> On Sep 3, 2013, at 6:45 PM, Fabrício Zimmerer Murta <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>> I think autotools has a concept of disallowing symlinks as it seems symlinks 
>> can't be done in a portable way, and the goal of autotools is making 
>> projects portable.
>> 
>> Well, if the autotools user feels like using symlinks, then it must be 
>> expected to break portability wherever you take your autoconfiscated code 
>> to. A choice to the user. Maybe in the case, as the project is bound to 
>> specific compilers, it would not be a problem to loose portability a bit 
>> more by considering symbolic linking around.
> 
> Fair enough.
> 
> We've been using sym links in the OMPI project for years in order to compile 
> a series of .c files in 2 different ways.  It's portable to all the places 
> that we need/want it.
> 
> -- 
> Jeff Squyres
> address@hidden
> For corporate legal information go to: 
> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]