bug-autoconf
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: configure script on OS/390


From: Akim Demaille
Subject: Re: configure script on OS/390
Date: 10 Jun 2002 10:55:10 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Honest Recruiter)

>>>>> "Werner" == Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> writes:

Werner> There is a peculiarity in the default compiler of OS/390 (now
Werner> called z/OS): It needs an argument even if called with -v:
>> But is this a bug report?  Do you see any failure caused by -v?

Werner> Well, not directly.  But it doesn't look nice in the
Werner> config.log.  The only problem is the strange `-+' option for
Werner> c++ to make the suffix `.cc' work -- and how shall you
Werner> identify the compiler properly if -v fails?

It's best effort, nothing serious happens if we don't know exactly
what compiler it is.  Actually, maybe using whatis can provide even
more accurate information.  We know of now robust way to get this
information from the compiler, and in some cases (ranlib) it's even
``dangerous'', since it can create a file `--version' or `-v' :(

Would you suggest that we always try -v with a file?



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]