bug-autoconf
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: problems with c89 and c++ on z/OS


From: James Tison
Subject: Re: problems with c89 and c++ on z/OS
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 13:16:41 -0400

Quite true. Am still pursuing the problem report.

--Jim--
James S. Tison
Senior Software Engineer
TPF Laboratory / Architecture
IBM Corporation
+1 203 486-2835 (voice/fax)
address@hidden


                                                                                
                                                
                      Werner LEMBERG                                            
                                                
                      <address@hidden>             To:       James 
Tison/Poughkeepsie/address@hidden                                     
                      Sent by:                 cc:       address@hidden, 
address@hidden                               
                      bug-autoconf-admi        Subject:  Re: problems with c89 
and c++ on z/OS                                  
                      address@hidden                                            
                                                     
                                                                                
                                                
                                                                                
                                                
                      07/10/2002 14:11                                          
                                                
                                                                                
                                                
                                                                                
                                                



> The workaround is to set _<fe>_ACCEPTABLE_RC=0, where
> <fe>={CC,C89,CXX}, then issue the compile. The default for
> _ACCEPTABLE_RC is 4, which is creating the bad behavior.

This workaround works only for code which never produces a warning,
right?  Otherwise, even harmless warnings makes the compiler abort.


    Werner









reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]