bug-autoconf
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bug in AC_LIBOBJ, and autoconf 2.59


From: Alfred M. Szmidt
Subject: Re: Bug in AC_LIBOBJ, and autoconf 2.59
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 13:04:35 +0100 (MET)

Hmph, seems that you can ignore this.  Seems that it was a bug in the
inetutils configure.ac script after all, we improperly use
AC_CONFIG_LINKS.  Thanks!

------- Start of forwarded message -------
To: "Alfred M. Szmidt" <address@hidden>
cc: "Reish, Dan A" <address@hidden>, address@hidden
Subject: Re: [bug-inetutils] Cannot compile inetutils-1.4.2 on Solaris 2.8 
machine
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 10:39:29 +0200
From: Sergey Poznyakoff <address@hidden>

Alfred M. Szmidt <address@hidden> wrote:

> 
> Ugh, this seems like a bug in autoconf....

Nope, that's a bug in configure.ac. It improperly uses AC_CONFIG_LINKS
at line 790. Older autoconfs allowed such usage. Recent versions,
however, require that the argument to AC_CONFIG_LINKS be a literal
string. I'll fix this later today.

Regards,
Sergey
------- End of forwarded message -------




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]