[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[GNU Autoconf 2.59c] testsuite ... 63 64 66 67 73 ... failed
From: |
Ralf Menzel |
Subject: |
[GNU Autoconf 2.59c] testsuite ... 63 64 66 67 73 ... failed |
Date: |
Mon, 06 Jun 2005 21:01:31 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Reasonable Discussion, usg-unix-v) |
Hi,
the latest CVS checkout of autoconf showed a few regressions on my
Solaris 9 system using mostly native tools. The problem seems to be a
regular expression where a asterisk is applied to a parenthesised
sub-expression. My reading of the sed manual page tells me that the
native Solaris sed does only provide for the asterisk's use with
one-character regular expressions. For example:
--- snip ---
bash> echo '1*23*4' | /usr/bin/sed 's/\(.\)*/x/g'
x2x4
bash> echo '1*23*4' | /usr/xpg4/bin/sed 's/\(.\)*/x/g'
x
--- snip ---
I hacked my version of autoconf to pass the tests 63, 64, 66, 67, and
73. Please, consider the patch I send as attachment.
Greetings,
Ralf Menzel
DIFF2
Description: Binary data
- [GNU Autoconf 2.59c] testsuite ... 63 64 66 67 73 ... failed,
Ralf Menzel <=
- Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.59c] testsuite ... 63 64 66 67 73 ... failed, Stepan Kasal, 2005/06/07
- Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.59c] testsuite ... 63 64 66 67 73 ... failed, Paul Eggert, 2005/06/11
- Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.59c] testsuite ... 63 64 66 67 73 ... failed, Stepan Kasal, 2005/06/21
- Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.59c] testsuite ... 63 64 66 67 73 ... failed, Stepan Kasal, 2005/06/22
- Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.59c] testsuite ... 63 64 66 67 73 ... failed, Derek Price, 2005/06/28
- Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.59c] testsuite ... 63 64 66 67 73 ... failed, Stepan Kasal, 2005/06/29
- Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.59c] testsuite ... 63 64 66 67 73 ... failed, Derek Price, 2005/06/29
- Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.59c] testsuite ... 63 64 66 67 73 ... failed, Stepan Kasal, 2005/06/30